This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 01:01:11PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > I would s/a value/values/ since there is one value for alloc and one value > for free, both based on the perturb byte. I think it should also say > "... depending on the low-order byte of this value," so nobody can think > that passing in more than 8 bits has any effect. It actually has. MALLOC_PERTURB_=0 doesn't do anything, while MALLOC_PERTURB_=256 does. Jakub
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |