This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Move __fortify_fail call out of line in x86 ____longjmp_chk

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-hacker at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 09:03:43 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move __fortify_fail call out of line in x86 ____longjmp_chk
References: <m38vvlaq1n.fsf@redhat.com> <BANLkTi=MrVdVLakdSV1Yc8O80-xcVTPTTw@mail.gmail.com><m34o68c34l.fsf@redhat.com>

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 08:57, Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com> wrote:
> That's how it should have been in the first place.

That's no reason, it's an opinion.  If the current code works there is
no reason to change anything.

References:
- [PATCH] Move __fortify_fail call out of line in x86 ____longjmp_chk
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] Move __fortify_fail call out of line in x86 ____longjmp_chk
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] Move __fortify_fail call out of line in x86 ____longjmp_chk
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]