This is the mail archive of the
libc-help@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: -fno-stack-protector
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier at gentoo dot org>
- Cc: libc-help at sourceware dot org, "Mark Seaborn" <mrs at mythic-beasts dot com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 07:52:21 -0400
- Subject: Re: -fno-stack-protector
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=xe+lMQ9OPIO93q8F9e4OIMV/QwXdHnXT3/mjMepyuSg=; b=Id2NXt/qWdCXpvwFnW4qiflsICbPEhB1WhvxynmfoUtg3pmjJi87DNNaOqrdVe+G1qBmLgYFQOPQ1mY3S7JVBfguAX3ItQsPTVF77h/MQeTtPmZmw3DTjEPKyDqhVtHsiWDNcy9Jr3PiSX6RD7qFnLiuf/Aayw0FgxyCKwBBtSg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=H9GK4yNxyz+fvkJ0XRfyENsAQeWUSOqV7Bk9Qpb6pYgfaY1wZMRwd6zhXjAGker2Uf836hM2TE4b3eg4OUf0gUwGJE10dWPkIER4zYQTYTwtXZ7ALQeW15pMxljpUX2T39XD+NNAI6TXjiiy2TLAdu7v5NS/NU0msD/Yu+CvOPI=
- References: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0805031211310.10349@canta> <200805051203.02134.vapier@gentoo.org> <20080506.224744.1005860433.mrs@localhost.localdomain> <200805070019.04446.vapier@gentoo.org>
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> this list was *just created*. we've been doing Hardened Gentoo for years. i
> also pointed out that we've attempted in the past to get things merged only
> to have drepper tell us to toss off.
<rant>
The common thread here is that people want to build glibc differently
for different distros.
Someone should try to get the options infrastructure merged from
eglibc[1] to glibc.
At the very least this allows one to drape new features on top of the
existing framework.
If existing distros don't want the new features, they wouldn't enable them.
Contributed features would have an assigned maintainer, easing the
maintenance burden on core developers.
</rant>
Cheers,
Carlos.
[1] http://www.eglibc.org