This is the mail archive of the
libc-help@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: autoconf AC_PREREQ ?
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann dot morin dot 1998 at anciens dot enib dot fr>
- Cc: libc-help at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:30:24 -0400
- Subject: Re: autoconf AC_PREREQ ?
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=Pa8m9QNSQHE6yr+Y21my67ZAb9nl+v3mUsKhERE/TE4=; b=GNPc9WassBpVcoqjboWz3tyWXG37ySadqB2jVt+yjBgWo8w6VjUM3fgW9bWO8Isb1W Bggng3k2XusbZiyicY3KoY1RV1SCRLmZCR+PAHPXpnSFr46iFmuxBGJMurxB/ynj0RgR fcu9CV1giMQNODSARaCfP1ABh9vK2XgIxNGUQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=GJ0pS++ag93J/sz5nVkRBjGMFbXcnrihsTtyBlCfucAh2f/513A5MjvmpDC0wEm3aH CJHoYCbAZrwLnxfKnDpWgI2rfr6IBqfjLPtrVUdfO3eOkF2FPk0pg7+AEPN8cEE0FqdJ 6FzqofMiLofeKUkmyL/zY76fLU225m3vWq07w=
- References: <200809240729.56161.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> <200809302247.35377.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> <119aab440809301420wa5fcbe4qb61847690b06465b@mail.gmail.com> <200810022103.08060.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Yann E. MORIN
<yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote:
> So with glibc, autoconf-2.53+ is required for glibc/configure.in, and the
> wrapper correctly calls autoconf2.50. But because configure.in fragments are
> parsed with the wrapper script, and they don't match the heuristics to call
> autoconf2.50, autoconf2.13 gets called. Hence the errors.
This is probably the easiest solution. Could you writeup a patch for
this against CVS head, and test it?
Can you quote the autoconf manual describing the naming of
"configure.ac" scripts?
Cheers,
Carlos.