This is the mail archive of the
libc-help@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: inlining failed
- From: Petr Baudis <pasky at suse dot cz>
- To: Nix <nix at esperi dot org dot uk>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>,Dominik Táborský <bremby at seznam dot cz>,libc-help at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 02:11:57 +0100
- Subject: Re: inlining failed
- References: <1227974019.24048.32.camel@eddy> <87wsemclqi.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <119aab440811291304o2c929d3bw9fb3c05c2a814a6b@mail.gmail.com> <87skpacjsb.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <119aab440811291357h4689c400ka112d66b235154de@mail.gmail.com> <87zljc21nx.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 01:02:10AM +0000, Nix wrote:
> In his typical utterly charmless fashion Ulrich WONTFIXed it with a
> blunt one-liner before I even had time to attach the patch. I don't care
> what Ulrich thinks of it, really, as far as I can tell he hates
> everything.
>
> Perhaps some distros will be interested in it.
FWIW, I will certainly investigate this for future inclusion in SUSE,
I'm wondering what kind of so bad downsides does Ulrich see here - I
wouldn't think the check would have noticeable effect on performance,
though it should of course be measured...
Petr "Pasky" Baudis