This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sourceware.org mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: How to add crh.po, and tt@iqtel locale's .po for gettext


On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:15:21AM -0500, Reshat Sabiq wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Danilo Åegan yazmÄÅ:
> > Hi Reshat,
> > 
> > Yesterday at 23:14, Reshat Sabiq wrote:
> > 
> >> Isn't there already sr_CS@ije locale? Since ije isn't fully spelled
> >> out there
> > 
> > No.  That one might be present in outside sources such as belocs
> > (Denis Barbier's collection of locales) simply because GNU libc
> > maintainer(s?) don't accept locales for dialects. 
> Wow. That's a new nuance. Is belocs as widely accepted as glibc?

No, I believe that Debian and its derivatives are the only one to have it,
and this is an extra package, locales come from glibc by default.

> For instance, do Fedora or SUSE users get sr_CS@ije or sr_CS@Latn from
> the distro, or do they have to install it on their own because it's
> not in glibc?

They have to install it by hand.

> In short, is there a big motivation for a locale to be in glibc, as
> opposed to just being in belocs?

Well, you are the one being motivated, so it is up to you ;)

> Also, am i right to conclude that if a locale makes into glibc, it
> will be included in belocs?

Yes.

Denis


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]