This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
Re: moderation of libc-licales list
- From: Keld Simonsen <keld at keldix dot com>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: keld at keldix dot com <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>,libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:15:05 +0100
- Subject: Re: moderation of libc-licales list
- References: <bug-10580-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> <bug-10580-716-FEKzTKiEm3@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> <20130216232414.GA22283@rap.rap.dk> <51239C0E.8080802@redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:36:46AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 02/16/2013 06:24 PM, Keld Simonsen wrote:
> > I am one of the moderators of the libc-locales list.
> > I am wondering what is happening there.
> > I see messages to the list accepted before I even get
> > to accept the message. That is really fine with me,
> > as these all are from people that send something useful.
> > Presumably the senders are on the list allready.
> > But I do not think the other moderator has had the time
> > to do the acceptance. So it looks like the accptance
> > has been done automatically.
> >
> > So if some automatic acceptance is done, I would appreciate
> > that the message is not also sent to me. Sometimes
> > there are many messages and I have some difficulty finding out
> > which messages allready have been accepted, and which have not,
> > so I then go on accepting them all, after checking that
> > they are not spam etc. That is a bit of a waste of time.
> >
> > What is actually the procedure in effect here, and could it be improved?
>
> There is no procedure in effect :-)
>
> You can contact overseers@sourcware.org to determine if moderation
> is enabled for libc-locales@sourceware.org.
>
> My preference is that there be *no* moderation on this list, like
> we have now for libc-alpha and libc-help.
>
> I would suggest using filtering to remove email messages you
> don't need.
I would prefer moderation with a whitelist of the people that are
on the list. Is that a possibility?
best regards
keld