This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: hot to support different ISA?
- From: "guo guo" <sunnyboyguo at gmail dot com>
- To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:41:36 -0700
- Subject: Re: hot to support different ISA?
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S2d0OI6nvfymkqh1AxDbF4SjBYAjsNKQAdPhF7aVmpncMRVT8meGxohsrDIEMUjPYFjbenNBT4BvdOSUlHjlWxK1dVHLKByqxbNuM5OqGATL4kjUs7/mmX78AzQppLQ1g16oqR6vgRkw3CtcCVtHuXqc4z37lqtGHdBkwYdBNv0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=f4wRpgGhvhYPhcCRG3fcHMx2thwReDR1ClqfSwQvPvQkDMLI4Fa57kLyP1/AMjQWUGz6Gd5gMLNzjt70sehcqGD4g6p//HmA17/tjKXt4jQS9Kns58NHwu6d43cONJsAi+kfxQnXcvjoVU4FB7N8rN61PX7sPj4IGNIg+nyj7rc=
- References: <50f30abd0708142126w1432d2b9n7ab523364de3eb80@mail.gmail.com> <20070815104929.GA8342@caradoc.them.org>
Hi Daniel,
is it just affected by the -mips* option of gcc? i'm not sure who decide it.
is gcc or as or ld to generate corresponding code according the -mips* option?
maybe, i need to check my tool chain.
Best regards,
Tony
2007/8/15, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:26:55PM -0700, guo guo wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > when i build glibc2.5, under the directory ports/sysdeps/mips/, i
> > can't find anything information for r3000, r6000,.... how can i
> > configure it for specified mips chip? then i can specify -mips1 or
> > -mips2 or mips3...flags for different ISA.
>
> Just specify the right CFLAGS when you configure.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery
>