This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Friday 02 January 2009 15:57:13 Matt Turner wrote: > What are the implications of it being moved to ports? it isnt actively tested nor will it hold up a release > Do we have to have an active maintainer in order for patches to be accepted? > > I know Alpha assembly but I don't think I know enough about glibc to > be the maintainer, though I'd certainly like to see it actively > maintained on Alpha. > > I'm trying to persuade HP to GPL their libots and libcpml so we can > include bits in glibc, but I'm not sure this would be possible without > an Alpha maintainer. no idea about who is going to be merging, but it's certainly being maintained in at least Gentoo. glibc-2.9 seems to work fine for us with a couple of patches that we've written. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |