This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: NEON optimized implementation of memcpy.
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Holger Freyther <zecke at selfish dot org>
- Cc: libc-ports at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:23:41 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: NEON optimized implementation of memcpy.
- References: <200907051821.04030.siarhei.siamashka@nokia.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0907141636320.6532@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <loom.20091004T073120-451@post.gmane.org>
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Holger Freyther wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers <joseph <at> codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> >
> > We can't consider this patch while there isn't a copyright assignment or
> > disclaimer on file at the FSF that covers it.
> >
> > We also have a NEON memcpy at CodeSourcery (and performance improvements
> > to non-NEON memcpy), as well as versions of some other string functions,
> > adapted to glibc, that ARM recently contributed to newlib, but those are
> > also waiting on copyright assignments from ARM. I haven't compared the
> > performance of the two implementations.
>
> Hello,
>
> is there any update on this? I have a workload where memcpy is showing
I do not see any relevant updates to the FSF copyright.list.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com