This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?)

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
Cc: Thomas Orgis <sobukus at sourcemage dot org>, libc-ports at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:59:19 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?)
References: <20091108171706.60cfb6dc@sunscreen> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911081623230.10265@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911081701270.10265@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <119aab440911080951l2693cfe8p4ea6afc648728642@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> I'm about to mark #4457 as fixed on trunk, but needed on glibc_2.11,
> who is the branch maintainer for glibc_2.11?

I am presuming that when 2.11 branches it will do so based on current 
master (not on the 2.11 tag) and so all fixes checked in to libc so far 
will be on 2.11 branch.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?)
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?
  - From: Thomas Orgis
- Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?)
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]