This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Tagging ports for 2.12

From: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 22:03:55 -0400
Subject: Re: Tagging ports for 2.12
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005032356230.26890@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have a reason not to tag and branch ports for 2.12 when libc
> is branched? ?As far as I know, ARM, MIPS, Power soft-float and M68K are
> up-to-date with libc changes; is there anything the HPPA or Alpha
> maintainers want to get in before the branch?
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> joseph@codesourcery.com

Yeah, it'd be nice to move some patches we've been carrying in Gentoo
into ports once and for all. I'll clean them up and send them tonight.
Might save Mike some time and headaches in the future. :)

And by the way, I'm not too concerned with something breaking the
alpha port, since it's been in pretty bad shape for a while now. Worst
case is that Gentoo adds a fifteenth alpha-related patch. ;)

Thanks,
Matt

References:
- Tagging ports for 2.12
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]