This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Tagging ports for 2.12

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org, "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams at gnu dot org>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 21:08:12 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Tagging ports for 2.12
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005032356230.26890@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <201005061604.30715.vapier@gentoo.org>

On Thu, 6 May 2010, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> On Monday 03 May 2010 19:58:10 Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Does anyone have a reason not to tag and branch ports for 2.12 when libc
> > is branched?  As far as I know, ARM, MIPS, Power soft-float and M68K are
> > up-to-date with libc changes; is there anything the HPPA or Alpha
> > maintainers want to get in before the branch?
> 
> let's do it so Alfred can roll tarballs for glibc and the ports addon :)

I've now tagged 2.12 for ports.  It will be branched once libc has 
branched.

http://sourceware.org/ml/glibc-cvs/2010-q2/msg00121.html

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- Tagging ports for 2.12
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Tagging ports for 2.12
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]