This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: [PATCH] powerpc: 405/440/464/476 support and optimizations
- From: acrux <acrux_it at libero dot it>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:24:28 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: 405/440/464/476 support and optimizations
- References: <1283448864.3854.56.camel@gargoyle> <AANLkTi=og_UD=p_GAjPAXn_MeyPUE2v6vjpq1uaQNNj7@mail.gmail.com> <1283526020.3854.77.camel@gargoyle> <1286218436.3679.1.camel@gargoyle> <1292271927.3622.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <AANLkTi=exjK4EvGG9FoU+iK8W3XjYzWew8q3o_t20URu@mail.gmail.com> <33163939.post@talk.nabble.com> <CADZpyiwX0-Ydc2BVOxohe=+iVgGzHBn6Cra8bhpT28A1-FkeWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:34:50 -0500
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:30 PM, acrux@cruxppc.org
> <acrux@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> >
> > just tried to build glibc-2.13 "--with-cpu=440 --with-fp" on a
> > Sam440ep[1] (PPC440EP SoC [2]) but it remains stuck in this point:
> > CPP='gcc -m32 -E -x c-header'
> > ?/home/999/new/work/src/build32/elf/ld.so.1
> > --library-path
> > /home/999/new/work/src/build32:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/math:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/elf:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/dlfcn:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/nss:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/nis:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/rt:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/resolv:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/crypt:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/nptl
> > /home/999/new/work/src/build32/sunrpc/rpcgen -Y ../scripts -c
> > rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.x -o
> > /home/999/new/work/src/build32/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.T
>
> This is the first use of the newly build dynamic loader.
>
> A failure here means that the dynamic loader has not been correctly
> compiled.
>
> You should debug this to figure out what is going wrong in the loader.
>
i know, but i've no resource and i guess not enough skill to debug and
fix it.
As i received a borda with a 440EP SoC, just only for fun, i
tested a build "--with-cpu=440 --with-fp".
I'd like to know if somobody really tested these features.
> > Here my config.log: http://cruxppc.org/~acrux/config.log
> > Instead i successfully built glibc-2.13 without "--with-cpu=440
> > --with-fp" . I'm using an updated CRUX PPC 2.7 (32bit): gcc-4.5.3,
> > binutils-2.21.1, glibc-2.12.2
>
> Have you tested your compiler? What were the test results?
>
> Did you test binutils? What were the test results?
>
they finished their testsuites with only the well know failures for
their own releases. Thus i can say they are good.
best,
--nico
--
GNU/Linux on Power Architecture
CRUX PPC - http://cruxppc.org/