This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH roland/arm-hwcap-vfp] don't use HWCAP_ARM_* in OS-independent code

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>, <libc-ports at sourceware dot org>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH roland/arm-hwcap-vfp] don't use HWCAP_ARM_* in OS-independent code
References: <20120808235921.AA4292C075@topped-with-meat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1208091113000.10689@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20120809171033.CC7D32C0FD@topped-with-meat.com> <5023F173.1040506@systemhalted.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1208091843510.21255@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

> There are loads of internal headers used for various purposes and I don't 
> think we need to claim to invent a convention for the naming of a very 
> small subset of them.  Each header is given whatever name seems most 
> appropriately descriptive of its purpose.

I agree.

References:
- [PATCH roland/arm-hwcap-vfp] don't use HWCAP_ARM_* in OS-independent code
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH roland/arm-hwcap-vfp] don't use HWCAP_ARM_* in OS-independent code
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH roland/arm-hwcap-vfp] don't use HWCAP_ARM_* in OS-independent code
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH roland/arm-hwcap-vfp] don't use HWCAP_ARM_* in OS-independent code
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH roland/arm-hwcap-vfp] don't use HWCAP_ARM_* in OS-independent code
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]