This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sunday 12 August 2012 08:59:20 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > (Adding the entry, but with @@GLIBC_2.17 like the SH fanotify_mark, to the > hppa syscalls.list along with an appropriate Versions entry, is certainly > the safer approach than doing something with the potential to affect other > architectures, even though it may also be good to work out how to clean > these things up. Note hppa also needs fanotify_mark at a new version, and > note that cleanups here only help existing architectures; i originally posted just an entry updating hppa but was encouraged at looking at cleaning up everyone > there are no > issues for new architectures using linux-generic because linux-generic > already has the right entries in syscalls.list.) if all new arches are expected to start with linux-generic as its base, then i can see leaning towards just adding the entry to hppa and being done with it -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |