This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] mips: clear condition bit 23 in fpu too


From: Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>

We've been carrying this in Gentoo for quite a long time to fix some test
failures that people hit.

Original message:
	> make[4]: *** [/glibc/glibc-package-2.3/mips-linux/obj/math/test-fpucw.out] Error 1
	This test fails since the read back fpu control word is 0x80000 instead
	of 0x0. I wonder if this patch is correct:
	...
	which additionally masks out the condition bit 23 - note that the other
	condition bits (25-31) are masked out too?

URL: http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2002-10/msg00392.html
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>

2012-08-27  Guido Guenther  <agx@sigxcpu.org>

	* sysdeps/mips/fpu_control.h (_FPU_RESERVED): Set bit 29.
---
 ports/sysdeps/mips/fpu_control.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ports/sysdeps/mips/fpu_control.h b/ports/sysdeps/mips/fpu_control.h
index e9c859a..7307d03 100644
--- a/ports/sysdeps/mips/fpu_control.h
+++ b/ports/sysdeps/mips/fpu_control.h
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ extern fpu_control_t __fpu_control;
 #define _FPU_RC_UP      0x2
 #define _FPU_RC_DOWN    0x3
 
-#define _FPU_RESERVED 0xfe3c0000  /* Reserved bits in cw */
+#define _FPU_RESERVED 0xfebc0000  /* Reserved bits in cw */
 
 
 /* The fdlibm code requires strict IEEE double precision arithmetic,
-- 
1.7.9.7


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]