This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Has anyone progressed/tried to port glibc to non posix system (windows)

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, Vishal Agrawal <vishal4556 at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:09:09 -0400
Subject: Re: Has anyone progressed/tried to port glibc to non posix system (windows)
References: <CAF6ttfHcG5s6OUAiuDfXWg3kQr_9Yxo+BHbhOZa8E2SeEnY-uA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAF6ttfGCzAgJVRYTL7nwacSm6fLfXhsSvuVm3G=aO3Y7dXdQTA at mail dot gmail dot com> <515EE355 dot 9070801 at redhat dot com>

On Friday 05 April 2013 10:44:37 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Why not consider using cygwin?

at least recommend mingw instead of cygwin :)
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Has anyone progressed/tried to port glibc to non posix system (windows)
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- Has anyone progressed/tried to port glibc to non posix system (windows)
  - From: Vishal Agrawal
- Re: Has anyone progressed/tried to port glibc to non posix system (windows)
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]