This is the mail archive of the libffi-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libffi project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: your patch broke darwin libffi

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Cc: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>, libffi-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:13:13 -0500
Subject: Re: your patch broke darwin libffi
References: <200201181628.LAA29338@makai.watson.ibm.com><3C48C200.4020807@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>

>>>>> Bryce McKinlay writes:

Bryce> Wouldn't it be better to give this function the same name in both aix.S 
Bryce> and darwin.S, since only one of them gets built?

	I was trying to add the support with as little intrusion as
necessary while utilizing the similarities.  Darwin is not AIX and AIX is
not Darwin.  What name would you suggest?  During our last discussion, no
one could find a common name.

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: your patch broke darwin libffi
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- Re: your patch broke darwin libffi
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: your patch broke darwin libffi
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]