This is the mail archive of the libffi-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the libffi project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
This is possibly a stupid question -- but aren't the main sources inIt's a good question. What we have here is a case of the tail wagging the dog...
the gcc subversion repository?
Thanks for the input. Why do you have to remove the live_support section attribute? Is it just because Max OS X 10 tools don't recognize it? Is this something we should have a configure test for?In any case, I'd appreciate it if people would like to try checking
out the latest from the libffi cvs repository and build/test it.
FWIW, we (www.plt-scheme.org) recently updated our copy from the gcc repository, and it builds fine -- we have these patches:
* We recreated libffi/configure with autoconf version 2.61
* We changed config/multi.m4 (not inthe libffi directory) to allow in-source-tree builds, the change is from line:
if test "$with_target_subdir" != "."; then
to
if test ! -z "$with_target_subdir" && test "$with_target_subdir" != "."; then
* Removed +live_support in src/powerpc/darwin_closure.S so it builds with Mac OS X 10.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |