[v3] c++0x includes

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:

| Doug Gregor wrote:
| 
| > What we need is for the C++ committee to define a new value of
| > __cplusplus for C++0x, so C libraries can start doing the right
| > thing...
| 
| I think that you can detect C++0x without knowing the exact value by
| using #if __cplusplus > 199711L.

Well, that may actually be C++03 without C++0x. :-/

-- Gaby