AIX libstdc++ missing symbols
David Edelsohn
dje.gcc@gmail.com
Fri Sep 23 22:23:00 GMT 2011
My latest bootstrap of GCC on AIX failed due to missing symbols in
libstdc++ expected by libgmpxx:
exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load
program /tmp/20110922/./gcc/cc1plus/tmp/20110922/./g
cc/cc1plus because of the following errors:
because of the following errors:
0509-130 Symbol resolution failed for 0509-130 Symbol
resolution failed for /usr/gnu/lib/libgmpxx.a(libgmpxx
.so.4)/usr/gnu/lib/libgmpxx.a(libgmpxx.so.4) because:
because:
0509-136 Symbol 0509-136 Symbol
_ZNSt6localeD1Ev_ZNSt6localeD1Ev (number (number 44) is not exporte
d from
dependent module ) is not exported from
dependent module
/tmp/20110922/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(libstdc++.
so.6)/tmp/20110922/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(libstdc++.so.6).
.
0509-136 Symbol 0509-136 Symbol
_ZNSt6localeC1ERKS__ZNSt6localeC1ERKS_ (number (number 66) is not e
xported from
dependent module ) is not exported from
dependent module
/tmp/20110922/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(libstdc++.
so.6)/tmp/20110922/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(libstdc++.so.6).
.
0509-136 Symbol 0509-136 Symbol
_ZNSt8ios_base4InitD1Ev_ZNSt8ios_base4InitD1Ev (number (number 1010
) is not exported from
dependent module ) is not exported from
dependent module
/tmp/20110922/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(libstdc++.
so.6)/tmp/20110922/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(libstdc++.so.6).
.
0509-136 Symbol 0509-136 Symbol
_ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev_ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev (number (number 1111
) is not exported from
dependent module ) is not exported from
dependent module
/tmp/20110922/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(libstdc++.
so.6)/tmp/20110922/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(libstdc++.so.6).
Any idea what has changed and why those symbols no longer are exported
by libstdc++? This seems like a libstdc++ ABI change if they really
disappeared.
Thanks, David
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list