[v3] More noexcept -- 3rd

[Marc Glisse]

On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 09/18/2013 05:51 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> In debug array, we already have throw in noexcept functions, but if I
>> understand correctly it is only because of syntax limitations for constexpr
>> functions and aborts before throwing, although the use of
>> _GLIBCXX_THROW_OR_ABORT is suspicious. In any case, I am not changing this
>> with my patch.
> If I remember correctly, somebody invented that mild hack and suggested it to 
> indeed have a check as part of a constexpr function, not a trivial task. Jon 
> participated to that discussion. After a while I resurrected that old 
> discussion, tested the code and it appeared to work well. In practice, are 
> you experiencing specific problems with it?

No, no problem. For some reason I thought there would be issues when the 
macro expands to __builtin_abort(), but there aren't, great.

Any other comments on the patch? (Jon's "great" doesn't really sound like 
an "ok")

-- 
Marc Glisse