[PATCH 0/3] Uncontroversial improvements to C++20 wait-related implementation

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 23/03/21 09:26 -0700, Thiago Macieira via Libstdc++ wrote:
>On Tuesday, 23 March 2021 08:39:43 PDT Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>> I will be submitting a new patch for the
>> atomic.wait/barrier/latch/semaphore functionality a bit later today that
>> subsumes the changes to atomic_wait and latch, and includes the changes
>> to barrier.
>
>Thanks, Thomas
>
>Is that meant to be part of GCC 11's release?

Yes.

>If not, what do we do about preventing the future BC break and potential
>heisenbugs?
>
> 1) do nothing, accept they will happen silently

This is our current policy for experimental features and it isn't
going to change for GCC 11.


> 2) cause non-silent BC breaks
> 3) disable the code for now (unless explicitly opted-in)
>
>-- 
>Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>  Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering
>
>
>