Re: Some issues..

[Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>]

Hi,

On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 11:30, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Mark Wielaard writes:
>  > Which script is this? 
> 
> Err, the one in the BinaryCompatibility directory...
> 
> It's called `foo', of course!  :-)

Aha. Wow. I never found that before.
Ehe, how do you use/invoke it?

I tried setting JAVA/JAVAC/GCJ as variables before invoking foo, but in
all cases it fails in weird and wonderful ways either compiling or
running. One issue seems to be that it does want the gnu/testlet/*.java
files, but this is never specified in its classpath or sourcepath.

>  > Is it documented?
> 
> Yeah, right.

:)
I admit to be guilty of not documenting my batch_run and runner script.
But a little blurb in the README wouldn't hurt.
If I promise to add something about my scripts, could you add something
about yours? At least how to invoke the thing...

>  > Might it be a good idea to add these tests to a separate module
>  > like the visual tester and the verifier tests since they are
>  > actually different from the rest of the mauve core library tests?
> 
> Can you please be a little more specific about this?

Since it seem to not be integrated with the rest of the tests (but I
might be wrong about this since I couldn't get them working at all) it
might make sense to but it into their own module. Like the verifier
tests and the visual test engine (CVS modules verify and wonka). It
seems this binary compatibility test is useful on its own without any
dependency on the core library tests so we might want to promote it to
its own CVS module that people can just use without worrying about all
the rest. And it would add a new bullet point on the website which makes
the project seem more alive :)

Cheers,

Mark

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part