Re: patch committal.

["C. Brian Jones" <cbj at gnu dot org>]

On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 11:04, Thomas Zander wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sunday 02 May 2004 14:49, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Thomas Zander writes:
> >  > I've requested a cvs account several times; but have not even
> >  > received the courtesy of a yes/no answer.
> >
> > We should get you a CVS account.  However, your opinion that "its more
> > important to have people creating patches and moving the project
> > forward then to always have a 100% correct CVS" makes people worried.
> 
> That statement was discussed and I learned that mauve does not have any 
> sort of release cycle in which bugs can be fixed. Its 'released' as a 
> final product in CVS on a daily basis, so to say.
> I agree that that takes a slightly different approach.
> 
> > You should get CVS access, I think, 
> That would be nice; anyone I can contact?
> 
> > but of course you'll still need to 
> > post patches here for pre-commit discussion.  Everybody does that.
> No problem, if you think that helps :-)
> 
> > There were problems with your patches. I fixed the problems by hand.
> > Please don't provide he ChangeLog as a diff: it won't apply anyway.  I
> > have committed both these patches.  Please check they're OK.
> 
> After a CVS update I indeed found no file to be modified anymore. Thanx!

Tom Tromey can get you access.  Mauve has a fairly relaxed commit
policy, basically adding/fixing tests good, changing anything else
requires discussion.

Brian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part