This is the mail archive of the mauve-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the Mauve project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Fix for test gnu/testlet/java/lang/Integer/parseInt.java


On 18:20 Wed 17 Aug     , Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I think that the regression test "gnu/testlet/java/lang/Integer/parseInt.java"
> should be fixed to work correctly for pre JDK1.7 case (JDK1.0 .. JDK1.6) and
> also for JDK1.7 case. The difference between JDK1.6 and JDK1.7 is in the
> behaviour of method Integer.parseInt() when string beginning with '+' sign is
> parsed:
> 
> Integer.parseInt("+42")
> 
> JDK1.6 throws exception in this case, but parsing the same string is perfectly
> valid in JDK1.7. So I added the condition to the test which checks what JDK is
> being tested (I can't figure out how Mauve harness checks the "Tags: JDKxx"
> tag). I also changed the message printed in case JDK1.7 does not work correctly.
> 
> Is it possible to push the fixed test to Mauve repository please?
> 
> Thank you in advance,
> Pavel

Such tests are dubious because they assume compliance to one particular version,
which has never been true of GNU Classpath and can't be verified due to the lack
of a Free Software TCK.  There will also be versions of OpenJDK7 that report
as "1.7" but don't yet have this change.

Have you tested this with GNU Classpath?  I'm pretty sure it will break the
test there as it has the modern behaviour, but most GNU Classpath VMs tend
to report earlier versions due to the level of bytecode they support.

As the old behaviour is specific to versions of Sun/Oracle's JDK implementation,
it should check that this implementation is being used as well, rather than just
the version.

> --- gnu/testlet/java/lang/Integer/parseInt.java	2008-05-12 23:35:49.000000000 +0200
> +++ gnu/testlet/java/lang/Integer/parseInt.java	2011-08-17 17:17:16.000000000 +0200
> @@ -106,15 +106,31 @@
>      }
>    
>      // In JDK1.7, '+' is considered a valid character.
> -    try
> -      {
> -        i = Integer.parseInt("+10");
> -        harness.check(true);
> -	harness.check(i, 10);
> -      }
> -    catch (NumberFormatException nfe)
> -      {
> -    	harness.fail("Leading '+' does not throw NumberFormatException");
> +    // it means that the following step should be divided
> +    // for pre JDK1.7 case and >= JDK1.7
> +    String[] javaVersion = System.getProperty("java.version").split("\\.");
> +    if (Integer.parseInt(javaVersion[1]) >= 7) {
> +      try
> +        {
> +          i = Integer.parseInt("+10");
> +          harness.check(true);
> +          harness.check(i, 10);
> +        }
> +      catch (NumberFormatException nfe)
> +        {
> +          harness.fail("'+10' string is not parsed correctly as expected in JDK1.7");
> +        }
> +      }
> +    else { // pre JDK1.7 branch
> +      try
> +        {
> +          i = Integer.parseInt("+10");
> +          harness.fail("'+10' must throw NumberFormatException");
> +        }
> +      catch (NumberFormatException nfe)
> +        {
> +          harness.check(true);
> +        }
>        }
>  
>      try


-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://icedtea.classpath.org
PGP Key: F5862A37 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EA30 D855 D50F 90CD F54D  0698 0713 C3ED F586 2A37


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]