This is the mail archive of the
mauve-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the Mauve project.
Re: RFC: fix for Mauve test javax/swing/JTextArea/prefferedSize.java
Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 16:17 Fri 02 Sep , Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I think that the last 6 checks contained in Mauve test
>> "javax/swing/JTextArea/prefferedSize.java" should be changed. In the original
>> test, the preferred width of the JTextArea is compared with 100 pixels after
>> word line wrapping is enabled.
>>
>> But it does not make sense (IMHO) because the JTextArea contains only empty text
>> or some NL characters ('\n'), which means, that preferred and minimum width of
>> JTextArea should be 0 pixels, not 100 in both cases because empty text and NL
>> sequence has only some non-zero height, but zero width. This behaviour is
>> independent of auto wrapping and/or word wrapping.
>>
>> It's probably worth to add some check for preferred height.
>>
>> Here is proposed change to this test:
>>
>> --- preferredSize.java 2005-12-07 20:23:38.000000000 +0100
>> +++ prefferedsize.java 2011-09-02 16:02:00.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -51,14 +51,14 @@
>> ta2.setLineWrap(true);
>> ta2.setWrapStyleWord(true);
>>
>> - harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 100);
>> - harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 100);
>> + harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 0);
>> + harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 0);
>> ta2.setText("");
>> - harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 100);
>> - harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 100);
>> + harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 0);
>> + harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 0);
>> ta2.setText("\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n");
>> - harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 100);
>> - harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 100);
>> + harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 0);
>> + harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 0);
>> }
>> catch (Exception e)
>> {
>> ~
>>
>> Is it possible to change this test case please?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Pavel
>
> Do tests still pass with these changes?
yes