Re: Port of Newlib/libgloss for 68HC11 and 68HC12

["J. Johnston" <jjohnstn at cygnus dot com>]

Stephane Carrez wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> "J. Johnston" a écrit :
> >   The code has a copyright assignment to the FSF, but has a BSD-like license.
> > To my knowledge, the FSF doesn't accept any code unless it has a GPL license
> > and newlib does not accept GPL'd code.
> >
> >   Is there any reason why you cannot assign the copyright to Red Hat or
> > keep it in your own name?
> >
> > -- Jeff J.
> 
> I have no strong opinion and can assign the copyright to Red Hat or keep it.
> What is the easiest way to do?
> 

It is easiest to keep it in your own name.  

> Is it difficult to assign the copyright to Red Hat ?
> 

It would require a special form suspiciously like the Cygwin-form, only
with s/Cygwin/newlib/.  I will post to the web-page shortly.

-- Jeff J.