Patch: drop NEC v810 support
Nathanael Nerode
neroden@twcny.rr.com
Mon Nov 11 13:01:00 GMT 2002
Jim Wilson wrote:
> It was a newlib only port, using the NEC compiler. It was a rather unusual
> port, and one that we don't need to worry about now. Dropping the mt-v810
> file is OK.
So if I submitted a patch which just did this, it could get approved easily?
* configure.in (v810*): Remove special setting of tools.
--- configure.in 2002-11-10 18:58:13.000000000 -0500
+++ configure.in.new 2002-11-10 18:57:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -1111,9 +1108,6 @@
extra_arflags_for_target=
extra_nmflags_for_target=
case "${target}" in
- v810*)
- target_makefile_frag="config/mt-v810"
- ;;
i[3456]86-*-netware*)
target_makefile_frag="config/mt-netware"
;;
> Dropping the port is OK too, but if we are doing that, then we may as well
> delete the newlib bits. The main part is in the lib/sys/sysnec810 directory
> and the newlib configure.host file, but there are various files with
> #ifdef __v810__ in them to deal with NEC compiler specific issues. Use
> "find . -type f | xargs grep v810" to find them. This isn't your problem
> though, it is a problem for the newlib maintainers to worry about.
>
> Jim
I just want to get through the autoconfiscation blockers.
--Nathanael
More information about the Newlib
mailing list