This is the mail archive of the newlib@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: /usr/include/ndbm.h supposed to be in newlib?

From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
To: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat dot com>
Cc: newlib at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:40:31 -0400
Subject: Re: /usr/include/ndbm.h supposed to be in newlib?
References: <20020624001111.GA20680@redhat.com> <20020624005207.GA31399@redhat.com> <1024939901.730.16.camel@toggle>

On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:31:39PM -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>I added the ndbm stuff because I thought it might be useful later.
>I'll remove it for now, and if we do need it later, I'll make it
>system-specific.

Thanks.

Someone also noticed that the db stuff has been added.  That is also causing
some cygwin heartburn.  Could that be reverted too?

cgf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /usr/include/ndbm.h supposed to be in newlib?
  - From: Thomas Fitzsimmons

References:
- /usr/include/ndbm.h supposed to be in newlib?
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: /usr/include/ndbm.h supposed to be in newlib?
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: /usr/include/ndbm.h supposed to be in newlib?
  - From: Thomas Fitzsimmons

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]