This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the newlib project.
newlib's nan(void) x ISO C99 nan(const char *)
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: newlib at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 03 Jul 2003 16:20:45 -0300
- Subject: newlib's nan(void) x ISO C99 nan(const char *)
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
Would anybody mind if we dropped nan(void) and nanf(void) in favor of
the ISO C99-compliant functions that take a string as an argument?
Should we try to retain backward-compatibility by means of macro
magic, or just bite the bullet and replace the old, non-conforming
functions and prototypes with the now-Standard ones?
If nobody objects, I'll implement the Standard-compliant functions in
the next few days.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer