Re: Patch ping: Fix README s/LPGL/LGPL/ Say license, not copyrightwhere approriate

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>]

Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:40:21 -0500 (EST)
> > From: jjohnstn <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
>
>
> > Sorry Hans.  I was away during the holidays and got back only to get a 
> > very nasty flu over the New Year's weekend.
>
>
> No rush.  Get well!
>
>
> > Patch applied.  Thanks.
>
>
> Presumably hand-edited?  I still see LPGL there.
> (noticed because of a cvs update conflict)

Yes...:(  Fixed.  See what the flu does to your brain.  :)

-- Jeff J.

> Index: README
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/newlib/README,v
> retrieving revision 1.12
> diff -c -p -u -p -r1.12 README
> --- README	6 Jan 2005 19:38:30 -0000	1.12
> +++ README	10 Jan 2005 15:21:57 -0000
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ of board support packages.
>  The newlib and libgloss subdirectories are a collection of software from
>  several sources, each with their own copyright and license.  See the file
>  COPYING.NEWLIB for details.  The rest of the release tree is under either
> -the GNU GPL or LPGL licenses.
> +the GNU GPL or LGPL licenses.
>  
>  THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR
>  IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED
>
> brgds, H-P