Re: crt0 formalization

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>]

It's for the spu.  I am guessing that Joel also got an error message 
regarding the patch size so it never got posted to the newlib msg list, 
though it made it to my inbox.

I have tar'd up the patch and attached to this message.

-- Jeff J.

Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > <resent due to sources.redhat.com rejecting my original reply message 
> > due to the fact it included the original patch and thereby exceeded a 
> > size constraint>
> >
> > Is it fair to say no one has objections to this patch?  I will check 
> > it in later today unless I hear otherwise.
> I don't remember seeing this patch and I don't see any email from 
> jschopp or a message with
> "formalization" in the subject in the newlib mailing list archives for 
> the past few months .
> It may be fine but I don't think it has been seen on the newlib list.
>
> Which platform is the crt0 for?
>
> --joel
> > -- Jeff J.
> >
> > jschopp wrote:
> > > In our recent SDK 2.0 and in patches being submitting for FSF gcc 
> > > there are some changes to crt0.  The attached patch has been 
> > > extensively tested as part of our SDK.  Everything works as 
> > > expected.  The only minor regression is that it pulls in atexit(), 
> > > which in turn pulls in malloc().  This works fine but takes up space, 
> > > which is precious on this platform.  Previous discussions on this 
> > > list have sent some patches with resolve the problem of pulling in 
> > > malloc.
> > >
> > > In my opinion the attached patch should be committed.
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: newlib-spu.patches.tar.gz
Description: Unix tar archive