This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: assert broken on spu-elf

From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans at us dot ibm dot com>
To: Kazunori Asayama <asayama at sm dot sony dot co dot jp>
Cc: Andrew_Pinski at PlayStation dot Sony dot Com, jschopp at austin dot ibm dot com, newlib at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:20:38 -0800
Subject: Re: assert broken on spu-elf
References: <45D21F00.4050002@austin.ibm.com> <OFACD0EC45.F04842E1-ON88257281.00706FE6-08257281.0070A343@playstation.sony.com> <20070214.114204.125692944.asayama@echo.sm.sony.co.jp>

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:42:04AM +0900, Kazunori Asayama wrote:
> Andrew_Pinski@PlayStation.Sony.Com wrote:
> > jschopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com> wrote on 02/13/2007 12:26:40 PM:
> > 
> > > Was the reproduced on the latest cvs or something older?
> > 
> > This was with yesterday's cvs.  I got a new machine so downloaded 
> > the latest cvs version of binutils and newlib and noticed my GCC
> > results were crap and I wondered why and then I noticed the error.
> 
> I could reproduce it. It was because offloaded stdio does not have
> *i*printf functions (restricted version of *printf functions).

Can you also try out putchar()? I'm getting undefined refs to swbuf_r with
recent cvs, I assume this is also a problem with the spu offload change.

Thanks ...

-- Patrick Mansfield

Follow-Ups:
- Re: assert broken on spu-elf
  - From: Patrick Mansfield

References:
- Re: assert broken on spu-elf
  - From: jschopp
- Re: assert broken on spu-elf
  - From: Andrew_Pinski
- Re: assert broken on spu-elf
  - From: Kazunori Asayama

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]