Re: [patch] wchar stdio patches broke infos

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 14 16:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>   
> > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:36 -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> >     
> > > Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > >       
> > > > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > > >   
> > > >         
> > > > > Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > > >     
> > > > >           
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The recently applied wchar/stdio patches broke "make info".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Below is a pretty rough patch, which got me building newlib again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ralf
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   
> > > > > >       
> > > > > >             
> > > > > Patch checked in minus the getwc putwc documentation additions.
> > > > >     
> > > > >           
> > > > Any particular reason for this? They are C99, SUSv3, ISO etc.
> > > >
> > > > Ralf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >         
> > > Per Corinna's note, they were already documented in other source files 
> > > (namely fputwc.c and fgetwc.c).
> > >       
> > Well, current newlib doesn't build, seemingly because of lack of
> > documentation:
> >     
>
> But why?  The man page entries in fgetwc.c and fputwc.c are formed
> exactly as, for instance, the entry in vfprintf.c, which also defines
> multiple functions.
>
>
> Corinna
>
>   
Problem was there were references to non-existent nodes getwc and putwc 
in stdio/stdio.tex.  I have fixed this.

-- Jeff J.