This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Use longlong.h?

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at spamcop dot net>, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>, newlib at sourceware dot org, gcc at gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:55:37 -0800
Subject: Re: Use longlong.h?
References: <20081217193540.5gm514vmcgkgkk0w-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <4963E926.1030207@redhat.com> <20090107071502.ty3pfzpk2socc80o-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901071524130.2547@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4974C8C4.4030306@codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> 
>> As code shared by GCC and glibc I would suggest the same license notice as 
>> soft-fp (LGPL >= 2.1 + exception) to allow an identical file to be shared.  
>> (Indeed, soft-fp uses this header.)  The version in GMP diverged long ago 
>> so sharing the file with that may not be feasible.
> 
> I have suggested this change to the SC.

The FSF has approved the change.  Joseph, would you please update the
license notice on the file to match soft-fp?  Please update any active
branches with the problem as well to avoid confusion for anyone working
from those branches.

Thank you,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use longlong.h?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- Re: Use longlong.h?
  - From: Jeff Johnston
- Re: Use longlong.h?
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: Use longlong.h?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Use longlong.h?
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]