Re: [PATCH] New functions wprintf, fwprintf, swprintf, vwprintf, vfwprintf, vswprintf

[Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat dot com>]

On Mar  5 14:40, Howland Craig D (Craig) wrote:
> Since the wide-character functions were introduced for C99, which also
> introduced and requires the long long (and long double) types, does it
> make sense to propagate the printf _WANT_IO_LONG_LONG configuration
> option to the wide functions?

IMHO, yes.  There might still a legitimate interest to keep this in for
a couple of smaller targets.

> Should the Newlib printf flag extensions (DOUq) be kept for wprintf?

Probably not.  I thought to remove them as well at one point, but
wanted to discuss this on the list first.  I just forgot to mention this
in my patch submission.  Thanks for following up with this question.
I thin we should remove them, yes.  I'm interested in Jeff's opinion,
though.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat