This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]

From: IWAMURO Motonori <deenheart at gmail dot com>
To: cygwin at cygwin dot com, newlib at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:06:34 +0900
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]
References: <20090512165404.GW21324@calimero.vinschen.de> <416096c60905120956n5521929bm69586f5e6325a994@mail.gmail.com> <20090512173153.GY21324@calimero.vinschen.de> <3f0ad08d0905140858j17c7b374paa649f18ef18178d@mail.gmail.com> <200905201652.n4KGqYGm000509@mail.bln1.bf.nsn-intra.net> <200906051625.n55GP6t3028411@mail.bln1.bf.nsn-intra.net> <20090606093102.GJ23519@calimero.vinschen.de>

2009/6/6 Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>:
> I vote for @cjkwide, regardless of Andy's objection. ?People using CJK
> will know the meaning and it has the additional advantage to be a rather
> simple to memorize identifier.

I oppose @cjkwide approach because I don't think that I need make
special cases give priority more than general cases.

I think that Andy's approach is better.
-- 
IWAMURO Motnori <http://vmi.jp/>

References:
- [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]
  - From: Andy Koppe
- Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]
  - From: IWAMURO Motonori
- Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]
  - From: Thomas Wolff
- Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]
  - From: Thomas Wolff
- Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]