This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K

From: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>
Cc: Robert Morin <robert dot morin at gmail dot com>, newlib at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:58:53 +0300
Subject: Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K
References: <4B1D443C.8080108@codesourcery.com> <4B1D4E82.90506@codesourcery.com> <f79377a0912071147k34ab9b30lb7bdd774abde5a57@mail.gmail.com> <4B215A3A.8000903@codesourcery.com> <f79377a0912101235w20e6e5efn252388ff1911548e@mail.gmail.com> <4B2208F8.3000506@codesourcery.com> <f79377a0912110952mb942d70sea9d9e2575750e80@mail.gmail.com> <4B22C27D.9000808@redhat.com>

On 12/12/09 1:06 AM, Jeff Johnston wrote:

I'm willing to commit the patch if nobody has any objections.  Maxim,
did you want to do some further testing yourself? BTW: thanks for the
patch.

No, I'm quite sure the patch only affects mc68000 microarchitecture of processors and Robert tested it on those. BTW, I can check in the patch myself; I seem to have write access to newlib cvs. Do you want me to commit in the patch?

Regards,

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
CodeSourcery
maxim@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x724

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K
  - From: Jeff Johnston

References:
- Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K
  - From: Maxim Kuvyrkov
- Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K
  - From: Robert Morin
- Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K
  - From: Maxim Kuvyrkov
- Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K
  - From: Robert Morin
- Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K
  - From: Maxim Kuvyrkov
- Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K
  - From: Robert Morin
- Re: Broken memcpy() in 68K
  - From: Jeff Johnston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]