This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Monday 30 September 2013 12:47:26 Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 23:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:09:18 Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > This patch I sent out fixes parallel make of the install target on > > > MIPS. > > > > go for it > > Is that an official approval? I don't see your name in > newlib/MAINTAINERS and I was assuming that libgloss had the same > mantainers as newlib and that I would need an OK from Jeff or Corinna > to do the checkin (since there is no MIPS CPU maintainer listed). Or > are the rules for libgloss different? I don't want to step on any toes. for cpu-specific stuff that Jeff/Corinna don't track (which mips seems to fall under), people tend to take care of merging. i don't know if there's an official policy on the matter, but that's the status quo i've observed over the last few years. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |