On Monday 30 September 2013 12:47:26 Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 23:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:09:18 Steve Ellcey wrote:
This patch I sent out fixes parallel make of the install target on
MIPS.
go for it
Is that an official approval? I don't see your name in
newlib/MAINTAINERS and I was assuming that libgloss had the same
mantainers as newlib and that I would need an OK from Jeff or Corinna
to do the checkin (since there is no MIPS CPU maintainer listed). Or
are the rules for libgloss different? I don't want to step on any toes.
for cpu-specific stuff that Jeff/Corinna don't track (which mips seems to fall
under), people tend to take care of merging. i don't know if there's an
official policy on the matter, but that's the status quo i've observed over the
last few years.
-mike