This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [libcxx+newlib] nexttoward{f,l,} shims for _LDBL_EQ_DBL systems


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan Roelofs" <jonathan@codesourcery.com>
> To: "Jeff Johnston" <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
> Cc: "JF Bastien" <jfb@chromium.org>, "Craig Howland" <howland@lgsinnovations.com>, newlib@sourceware.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:38:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [libcxx+newlib] nexttoward{f,l,} shims for _LDBL_EQ_DBL systems
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/9/14 3:15 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > Just a couple comments.
> >
> > 1. The FORCE_EVAL macro looks for
> > double or long double, even though it is only used for floats in
> > nexttowardf
> > By any chance was this macro in a header that you brought into
> > the code and if so, would it not be better to put the general-purpose
> > macro in local.h?  Otherwise, I would just suggest removing the double/long
> > double
> > parts that are extraneous in this instance and clutter the code.
> FORCE_EVAL did come from a header, and yeah, local.h probably is a better
> place
> for it.
> >
> > If you took it from a header, please confirm the license was the same as
> > nexttowardf() which is fine btw for inclusion into newlib.
> That header has this at the top of it:
> 
>   * ====================================================
>   * Copyright (C) 1993 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
>   *
>   * Developed at SunPro, a Sun Microsystems, Inc. business.
>   * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this
>   * software is freely granted, provided that this notice
>   * is preserved.
>   * ====================================================
> 

In that case, just do the volatile assignment manually instead of adding a
second license.

> >
> > 2. You have put the nexttowardf function prototype in the math.h section
> > where
> > _LDBL_EQ_DOUBLE is true but the code itself doesn't use the flag as
> > it doesn't rely on long double internals.
> Oh, right. Good point. I'll take it out of _LDBL_EQ_DOUBLE.
> 
> Jon
> >
> > -- Jeff J.
> >
> 
> --
> Jon Roelofs
> jonathan@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]