This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Dec 18 18:48, Hale Wang wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib- > > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen > > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 6:06 PM > > To: newlib@sourceware.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] __fsetlocking > > > > On Dec 18 13:15, Hale Wang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I met some make info fails about the sectioning '__fsetlocking' and > > > '__fbufsize'. > > > Maybe the problem is that the .def files are created with node names > > > that don't match the file name. > > > > > > The command line (makeinfo versiong 5.2): > > > makeinfo --split-size=5000000 --split-size=5000000 --html -I > > > /newlib/newlib/libc -o libc.htp /newlib/newlib/libc/libc.texinfo > > > > > > The fail messages: > > > stdio/fseek.def:1: warning: node next `fseek' in menu `fsetpos' and > > > in sectioning `__fsetlocking' differ > > > [...] > > I'm not great in this makeinfo stuff, but afaics the new functions > > are lacking a menu entry in stdio.tex. I just applied a patch. Can > > you test it please? > > > > Hi Corinna, > > I can't see your patch right now. However, I have tried locally to add > the '__fbufsize' and '__fsetlocking' items in stdio.tex and it works. > So if your patch does the same thing, I think it's OK for me. I applied it 10:08 UTC, 40 minutes prior to your mail: https://sourceware.org/ml/newlib-cvs/2014-q4/msg00054.html Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
Attachment:
pgpNPcBU54CNi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |