This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] __fsetlocking


On Dec 18 18:48, Hale Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
> > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 6:06 PM
> > To: newlib@sourceware.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] __fsetlocking
> > 
> > On Dec 18 13:15, Hale Wang wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I met some make info fails about the sectioning '__fsetlocking' and
> > > '__fbufsize'.
> > > Maybe the problem is that the .def files are created with node names
> > > that don't match the file name.
> > >
> > > The command line (makeinfo versiong 5.2):
> > > 	makeinfo --split-size=5000000 --split-size=5000000  --html   -I
> > > /newlib/newlib/libc -o libc.htp /newlib/newlib/libc/libc.texinfo
> > >
> > > The fail messages:
> > > 	stdio/fseek.def:1: warning: node next `fseek' in menu `fsetpos' and
> > > in sectioning `__fsetlocking' differ
> > > [...]
> > I'm not great in this makeinfo stuff, but afaics the new functions
> > are lacking a menu entry in stdio.tex.  I just applied a patch.  Can
> > you test it please?
> > 
> 
> Hi Corinna,
> 
> I can't see your patch right now. However, I have tried locally to add
> the '__fbufsize' and '__fsetlocking' items in stdio.tex and it works.
> So if your patch does the same thing, I think it's OK for me.

I applied it 10:08 UTC, 40 minutes prior to your mail:

https://sourceware.org/ml/newlib-cvs/2014-q4/msg00054.html


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat

Attachment: pgpNPcBU54CNi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]