This is the mail archive of the
pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the pthreas-win32 project.
RE: problems linking
- From: Vikas Gandhi <VGandhi at quark dot co dot in>
- To: George Mardale <gix at delsyne dot ro>
- Cc: pthreads-win32 at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:00:34 +0530
- Subject: RE: problems linking
Please give all your details
which compiler are u using ?????
If I remember currently u can also make all the test during build itself
that too with no issues.
Please give more details what are u trying to do. Mail yr program also.
--Vikas
-----Original Message-----
From: George Mardale [mailto:gix@delsyne.ro]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 4:35 PM
To: Vikas Gandhi
Cc: pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: problems linking
Hi,
I tested one example (valid1.c), but the errors are still the same.
Any other ideas?
Thanks,
George.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vikas Gandhi" <VGandhi@quark.co.in>
To: "George Mardale" <gix@delsyne.ro>
Cc: <pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: problems linking
> Have u been able to compile the tests that come along with pthreads-win32.
I
> am pretty sure that u'll get your answers there itself.
>
> --Vikas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pthreads-win32-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:pthreads-win32-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of George
Mardale
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 9:29 PM
> To: pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: problems linking
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having a problem using "POSIX threads for win32" binaries.
>
> I am porting to wince an unix application which uses posix threads. The
> compilation works fine, but the linking phase fails (I use pthreadVCE.lib
> for linking). The message is:
> ... unresolved external symbol __imp_pthread_cond_wait referenced in ...
>
> I looked inside pthreadVCE.lib and it seems to have a function called
> __imp__pthread_cond_wait. So, there is an extra "_" appearing.
> Can you please point me to a solution to fix this problem?
>
> Best regards,
> George.