Re: [Fwd: export control pthreads-win32]

[Peter Slacik <peter dot slacik at tatramed dot sk>]

Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> Ross Johnson schrieb:
>
> > I suspect there is no answer but I thought I'd ask the list because it
> > hasn't come up before.
>
> Sounds like he wants to use pthreads-win32 in a product that will be
> shipped to Cuba or something.
> However I don't know how US export regulations apply to free software
> (with commercial software you often have to agree not to reexport to
> Cuba even indirectly when downloading something, but here it's just the
> (L)GPL). However we see countries like Cuba use free software and I've
> never heard of someone being put to court for giing it to them.
>
> Philipp

While using free softwae, I've often seen similar approach to those 
expressed by PuTTY 
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/%7Esgtatham/putty/> authors:
> /*LEGAL WARNING*: Use of PuTTY, PSCP, PSFTP and Plink is illegal in 
> countries where encryption is outlawed. I believe it is legal to use 
> PuTTY, PSCP, PSFTP and Plink in England and Wales and in many other 
> countries, but I am not a lawyer and so if in doubt you should seek 
> legal advice before downloading it. You may find this site 
> <http://rechten.uvt.nl/koops/cryptolaw/> useful (it's a survey of 
> cryptography laws in many countries) but I can't vouch for its 
> correctness./

In other words, and especially concerning the following:
> *For export control legal expertise, I require information to the 
> country of origin and to any export restrictions. Particularly, I am 
> soliciting information of ECCN in US Commerce Control List and whether 
> a license exception may be used for it. 
I think that the destination countries' rules should be checked (by the 
potential user, I'd suggest) whether the SW is allowed to be used there.

But still, I'm anything but a lawyer....

Peter Slacik