This is the mail archive of the rda@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the rda project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Make rda native-only

From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: neroden at twcny dot rr dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, rda at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 29 Jan 2003 01:34:38 -0200
Subject: Re: Make rda native-only
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <20030124013918.GA16334@doctormoo><orn0lm76aa.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><3E3739E6.70804@twcny.rr.com><200301290221.h0T2LZa03191@greed.delorie.com>

On Jan 29, 2003, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:

>> Newlib (or cygwin) built in tree.  Presumably newlib is not sufficient 
>> to compile RDA?  Or it isn't clever enough to find the in-tree newlib 
>> for some reason?

> More likely, cygwin isn't built *yet*.  The cygwin runtime is one of
> the last things built in a combined tree.

Then rda is missing a dependency on cygwin?  Or perhaps we should not
build rda as part of the target set up, but as a host thing?  It's not
like rda depends on anything outside its tree, so if you want it only
for a target, you can run .../rda/configure and build it by itself!

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer

References:
- Re: Make rda native-only
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Re: Make rda native-only
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Make rda native-only
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Re: Make rda native-only
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]