This is the mail archive of the
rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the RHUG project.
Re: tomcat 4 jsp compilation status?
- From: Don Smith <smithdc at UMDNJ dot EDU>
- To: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
- Cc: rhug-rhats at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:54:45 -0400
- Subject: Re: tomcat 4 jsp compilation status?
- References: <3CC9B98A.1070506@umdnj.edu> <1019925156.3282.6.camel@dhcppc2>
A few questions,
1. From what i've read servlets seem to work, is this so, and if so how.
I ask because it seems that if servlets work then jsps should be not to
complicated as long as i can compile them to .class servlets
2. what version of gcj should i use to try and compile tomcat, is 3.0.4
new enough or do i need the 3.1 branch
3. has any of this been tried with tomcat4 or just 3.3
4. does the connection to apache work? and if so what connector should i
use? does mod_jk work as well
many thanks
don smith
Anthony Green wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 13:33, Don Smith wrote:
>
>
>>What's the status of a gcj version of tomcat that can support jsps?
>>Is it possible, if not what needs to be done?
>>
>>
>
>It's been a while since I looked at that (even though it would be really
>cool to get this working).
>
>When I did start looking at it, I went about it the wrong way -- setting
>up tomcat to compile the jsp code to .so immediately. Unfortunately,
>tomcat has many built in assumptions about the compiler generating
>.class files which it then manipulates (or just moves around, I think).
>
>It makes better sense to do this in baby steps. First get tomcat to
>compile jsp code to bytecode with 'gcj -C' and have everything work with
>the gcj interpreter.
>
>Once that all works, perhaps we can figure out a good way to compile the
>.class files to .so. I'm thinking this should be an extra step once the
>.class file is copied into the desired location by tomcat.
>
>It would be great if somebody (like you!) could spend a little time
>trying to get this to work. I'd be happy to help this person (like
>you!) along.
>
>AG
>
>
>