[Bug translator/2525] NMI Watchdog lockup with gettimeofday and do_timer probe

["joshua dot i dot stone at intel dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From joshua dot i dot stone at intel dot com  2006-04-07 17:51 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
Many thanks Bibo for the detailed analysis!

(In reply to comment #3)
> Sigh, another printk-like situation.  This would only be a partial solution, but
> could the timer callback functions be made one more level indirect, by
> interposing a level of work queing?

The problem was discovered with a kprobe, not a timer probe - are you just
extrapolating?  Indeed, this will likely be a problem for timer.profile as well,
but I think timer.ms and timer.jiffies run in a different context.  I will try
each variant and make sure though.

Work queuing may be ok for ms and jiffies probes if needed, but for
timer.profile I don't think that will work.  Won't the trapframe be invalid if
we delay the probe execution?

> Alternately, is there a lower-level approximate gettimeofday equivalent that
> does not putz with locks?

I don't know of one - nothing in linux/time.h looks promising.

The xtime_lock is exported though, so we should be able spin until read_seqretry
returns 0, and we can limit it to MAXTRYLOCK and throw an error, just like we do
for our own locks.  If someone else comes along and locks it after we determine
we're clear, that's ok because it won't be anyone in our callstack, so there
won't be a deadlock.

This should allow safely calling do_gettimeofday, and if we find a non-locking
alternative we can use that as a fallback.  I will implement this lock-test in
timestamp.stp...

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|systemtap at sources dot    |joshua dot i dot stone at
                   |redhat dot com              |intel dot com
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2525

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.