This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
David Smith wrote:
David Wilder wrote:I included the full test log. Let me know if you need something else.
A number of new errors popped up today when testing on the s390x. The new failures were:
FAIL: BASIC2 wasn't cached FAIL: OPTION2 wasn't cached FAIL: RUNTIME2 wasn't cached FAIL: BASIC4 wasn't cached
I have not investigated the cause yet.
Hmm, those are all related to the caching functionality/tests that I wrote. This could be a expect buffering problem. Can I see the full log for BASIC2?
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Running /home/testing/test_dir/stap_testing_redhat-release_200611132049/src/testsuite/systemtap.base/cache.exp ... Pass 1: parsed user script and PASS: BASIC1 wasn't cached Pass 1: parsed user script and 52 library script(s) in 5730usr/90sys/8488real ms. Pass 2: analyzed script: 1 probe(s), 0 function(s), 0 embed(s), 0 global(s) in 90usr/0sys/143real ms. Pass 3: translated to C into "/tmp/stapm04SSl/stap_068fff0329d56e3f18c39099d7f15ca8_184.c" in 0usr/0sys/2real ms. FAIL: BASIC2 wasn't cached Pass 1: parsed user script and 52 library script(s) in 5710usr/100sys/8399real ms. Pass 2: analyzed script: 1 probe(s), 0 function(s), 0 embed(s), 0 global(s) in 90usr/0sys/133real ms. Pass 3: translated to C into "/tmp/stapQXFRli/stap_649b328956d15729d5a17b8e8ec98b64_189.c" in 0usr/0sys/1real ms. PASS: OPTION1 wasn't cached
-- David Smith dsmith@redhat.com Red Hat http://www.redhat.com 256.217.0141 (direct) 256.837.0057 (fax)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |